Brechtian Performance- Second Reflection Essay

1. What Brechtian procedures did you use in your gathering? Myself and my individual gathering individuals utilized a wide range of Brechtian methods in our tranquility of Epic Theater. Initially, we settled on a social issue to put together our peice of theater with respect to, our last being the issue of gay marriage. We at that point set this issue dependent on the account of The Three Muskateers, and changed the name to Three Muskaqueers.This word play and the subject of gay marraige proceeded all through our peice of theater. Additionally, to proceed with the subject of homosexuality, we utilized Brechts thought of presenting Gods who pass jugdment on the play and the characters, Hamzah was our God of Gays. We additionally utilized a famous melody the YMCA and changed the words as indicated by our social issue and story. Other Brechtian procedures we utilized were scene cross cutting, gestus and greeze edges and we additionally had a storyteller who presented our play. 2. How very much did you think you utilized them (Popular audince response/commitment/understanding. Basic; assessments of different professionals and Self; individual targets you may have set yourself) I feel that our gathering utilized the vast majority of the procedures well indeed. We had the option to expressly utilize the Brechtian methods we picked, for example, utilizing a God to condemn and utilizing a storyteller, anyway I feel we could have enhanced different parts of Brechtian theater, for example, including the characters saying stage headings. On the off chance that we had included a greater amount of these procedures our peice would have become more Brechtian and would have been increasingly clear to the crowd that our exhibition was a peice of theater. I think we utilized our social issue and story well as we shrewdly made a statement with a double meaning from the first story of the Three Muskateers to the Three Muskaqueers. I feel that in general, from the response that we got from the crowd and how I feel about our peice of theater from the objectives I originally set myself that we utilized the methods quite well. 3. How very much did you ‘synthesis’ your substance (what you were stating) with the structure (how you were stating it) What did you believe was successful and why? I believe that we had a significant decent measure of combination in our creation as we kept the topic of â€Å"homosexuality† and â€Å"gay marraige† running all through the peice. We joined this topic into our picked signature melody, and into plays on words and jokes we made all through the peice of theater. I feel that we could have, towards the finish of the peice kept the subject running more as we changed the story by making one of the primary characters turn straight, and our educator and individual understudies didn't completely comprehend this decision, so I feel that we could have made this mroe evident or changed this. 4. In the event that you were not content with parts of your work, at that point what elective methodologies may you have sought after? Notice at any rate 2 parts of your friends work that you thought was powerful and why, as you think about other options. 1) I feel that we could have utilized the utilization of stage headings more since we did exclude this as much as possible have, and this piece of Epic Theater is a significant piece of Brechts fill in as he utilizes it to break the â€Å"fourth wall† between the on-screen characters, the play and the crowd. 2) I feel that we additionally could have utilized either emulate or veil in our theater. Albeit none of different gatherings did this, it is a very notable Brechtian method, and would have made our peice of theater stand apart considerably more using nboth Mime and covers.